Tony Bennett and the pack line defense

Thursday, April 23 2009 by Ben

With all the hoopla surrounding the Virginia football team’s transition to the spread offense, I’d like to take a few moments to educate Virginia fans about what Tony Bennett’s quasi-unique defensive strategy, known as the pack line defense, entails.  With the help of Coach Bru from favorite web site of mine, Xs and Os of basketball, I’ll take you through a highly simplified version of it.

The pack line defense was developed by Dick Bennett, Tony's father, and gained prominence when the elder Bennett used it at Wisconsin in the 1990s.  It has a couple of names and is sometimes called a “sagging man-to-man” defense. 

I started out calling this strategy “quasi-unique.” That’s primarily because the pack line shares a lot of principles with your typical man-to-man defense: each defender is matched up with an offensive player;  there’s a significant amount of defensive pressure placed on the ball handler; there’s rotations when an offensive player beats his defender off the dribble, etc.

Below is a diagram of a team playing the pack line defense.  (They're the triangles.) 

wsupack1The outline of gray area on the court is known as the pack line: defenders who are not guarding the ball are supposed stay within this area at all times.  This principle is often referred to as "keeping everyone on a string."   Essentially, the defense is trying to conserve the amount of space between the defenders at all times.

For example, look what happens when offensive player #1 (O1) passes the ball to offensive player #2 (O2).  Defensive player #1 (D1) sags back to the free throw line as D2 goes out to meet the ball handler.

Traditional man-to-man does not always feature as much help defense.  Often, man defenses will try to prevent passes that are close by, known as being "one pass away." Given the preponderance of Dave Leitao's defensive sets were predicated on low-risk/plain vanilla man to man - after all, Virginia ranked 235th in steal percentage last year - this may not be a dramatic change for the Wahoos.

The pack line defense also makes doubling in the post much, much easier.  The second figure below diagrams a catch by the center (O5) on the block.wsupack2 As you can see, another post player (D4), comes over to double-team.  This leaves his man (O4) open.  Because the defense is so packed in, D2 does not have to go very far to keep O4 from getting the ball. 

Doubling the post leaves 02 open on the outside.  However, O5 has got to find him across the court and through a double team of the two biggest defenders on the court.  It’s a gamble, for sure, but a calculated one that might pay off.

Less athletic teams playing this defense can "ugly up" the game and contend with more athletic teams.  Seeing as how the ACC has athletes in spades (and the current Virginia roster really doesn't), it should keep Virginia within striking distance of their ACC foes next season. 

For example, I think this defense would do wonders against Wake Forest. The Deacons athleticism makes them a hard match-up but their three point shooting leaves something to be desired. The pack line defense would keep them honest.

In sum, I think this defense is an outstanding fit for Virginia’s current roster and going forward, especially because the Wahoos are always going to be at a disadvantage in recruiting to schools like Duke and Carolina.  That doesn’t mean we can’t compete on the court with them, but it’s always going to be an uphill battle on the recruiting trail. 

However, don’t take my word for how great this defense is, take coach Bru’s assessment of Washington State's defense versus Winthrop in the 2008 NCAA tournament:

With the score tied 29-29 at the half, the Cougars went on a 25-1 run to start the second half and of course they never looked back...  It truly was one of the best defensive halves I've seen probably ever...[T]he Cougars probably play as good defense as you'll see in all of college basketball.

 

Coach Bru is the rockinest.  Please do check out his website, Xs and Os of basketball.  Dear Old UVa thanks him for allowing us to use his diagrams.

5 comment(s) and 2 trackback(s)

Pingback from Topics about Baseball | Tony Bennett and the pack line defense

A.J. wrote on Thursday, April 23 2009

What do you do if a team is getting good ball movement around the perimeter and is shooting the lights out from behind the arc? Wait till they calm down? Or does Bennett allow them to move into a full man-to-man to help out?

my only question is what happens when teams get out into more of a full court game (a la Duke, UNC)? You can't go man-man on a full court game and that was one of our downfall last year. First time we played unc, we did a horrible job of defending in the transition. What ever bennett does he has to step up and fix that immediately.

Another thing, ACC offenses are 10x better than pac 10 or Big 10 offense. Better shooters, better athletes, better all around players. He has to teach them help defense to defend against points in the paint, but he cannot ignore acc shooting.

AJ -

I've had a number of people ask me this question. Here's what the stats say: In terms of 3pt fg defense, the Cougars were bad, teams shot roughly 36% against them, so it does open the door to some 3-pters.

However, WSU was 3rd in the nation at 2-pt fg defense (40%) and 6th in the nation at 86 points per possession (adjusted). Given that the name of the game is keeping the other team from scoring. I'll take that.

DJ -

Bennett's game plan at WSU was to control the tempo as much as possible. Ideally, he'd like the game to have 45-55 possesions.

This doesn't always work: WSU's 19pt loss to UNC in the 2008 tournament was at 66 possessions. But that's the goal. Really that big margin of victory was more a function of the WSU offense going kaput than their defense falling short. They held Carolina way below their average that game.

Also, can we put away this nonsense about the pac-10 being an inferior conference? They're not, offensively or otherwise. Please see here:

kenpom.com/.../conf.php

It's just wrongheaded.

DJ wrote on Friday, April 24 2009

Ben

You made a terrific point on the Bennett scheme of play. He is going to try to lower the tempo which would effect the score of the game perhaps just as much as his defense. My point is his slow tempo game is going to be tough against a run-n-gun offense of UNC or Duke. I am optimistic that his style of coaching will impact the game tremendously though and we will be significant improvement to our team. I will agree with you totally on this.

However, the pac-10 is not the acc. The acc put more teams in post season play and won the whole tournemant. Traditionally UCLA has been dominant including three straight final fours. However, this was a down year for them so it was a down year for that conference.Pac 10 is a terrific conference. They are deep, have great coaches and programs. They just lack the top teir programs this year. UNC, Duke, and Wake would have whooped the top of the pac 10. With that being said it doesnt matter because the big east was by far the best conference.

In the Sunday issue of the New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell discusses a variety underdog tactics (H/T Truehoop ). The premise of the article is that the best way for an underdog to win is to fight the unconventional fight. Gladwell uses all sorts of historical

"UNC, Duke, and Wake would have whooped the top of the pac 10. With that being said it doesnt matter because the big east was by far the best conference."

The same way that Wake whooped Cleveland St? Sorry, but Wake wasn't in a mental position to whoop anybody in March, much less a good Pac-10 team. Once again, the ACC was Duke and Carolina.